Join our

mailing list.

Keep up to date with our latest insights.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Perspective

Workers’ compensation payments not conditional upon continued operation of employer

Nes Demir
Published:

Share

JBS Australia Pty Ltd (JBS) reduced a seasonal worker’s (Ms Bire) compensation payments to nil during its annual shutdown (reduction decision). The basis for the reduction decision was section 147 of the Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (the Act), which provides a worker must not receive an amount more than they would have received from their employment if they were at work and the injury had not been sustained.

In the five years preceding her injury, Ms Bire had not received payment during the annual shutdown nor sought alternative employment.

JBS’ reduction decision was overturned by the Queensland Workers’ Compensation Regulator and the Industrial Relations Commission. On appeal, the Industrial Court of Queensland confirmed compensation payments continue during periods of shutdown.

In dismissing JBS’ appeal, President Justice Martin referred to the object of the relevant Part of the Act, being to provide for compensation payments during the period of incapacity. While section 147 may (depending on the circumstances) have no effect or operate to limit the amount payable, it is not to provide a means of bringing compensation payments to an end.  This is in contrast to section 144A of the Act, which expressly sets out circumstances under which compensation payments stop.

Lessons

  1. The cost of a workers’ compensation claim can increase dramatically especially where there is a prolonged period before the injured worker returns to work. An effective return to work program is critical in reducing these costs.
  2. Always obtain legal advice before reducing a worker’s compensation payments. A wrongful reduction will add to the costs of the claim (with legal costs and potential increase in claim costs as it may discourage or prolong the worker’s return to work) and carry risks of creating a culture of distrust amongst workers towards the business.

See JBS Australia Pty Ltd v Workers’ Compensation Regulator [2020] ICQ 010

Nes Demir
Published:

Share

Stay updated with our Friday Workplace Briefing

Subscribe to receive the latest Friday Workplace Briefing in your inbox every Friday, where you can hear the critical news and developments that affect your workplace.

Have a question or need advice?

Our team are here to provide tailored advice for your business and workforce.

Managing Principal - Victoria

Principal Lawyer - Head of Workplace Relations

Legal Solutions.

Found.

Anything we can help you with?

Fusce sed egestas massa. Praesent eu sem pulvinar, condimentum massa ut, finibus ante. Praesent congue magna quis lectus placerat, tincidunt pellentesque ex placerat. Quisque facilisis quam et augue rutrum, at laoreet purus bibendum.

Join our

mailing list.

Keep up to date with our latest insights.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.